Penyalahgunaan Living Hadis dalam Kalangan Kelompok Liberal: Satu Sorotan Literatur Secara Sistematik
The Misappropriation of Living Hadith Among Liberal Groups: A Systematic Literature Highlights
Abstract
Living Hadith is the embodiment of hadiths in the form of beliefs and practices that contradict the real essence of the hadiths’ meaning. The liberal groups have adopted the contradictory hadiths’ meaning to defend their arguments. This study aims to conduct a systematic literature highlights on the hadiths of Rasulullah SAW that the liberal groups are using. The methodology used in this study is an observation on the background, discussion gaps, methods and findings for each of the hadiths used by the groups. The study identified the liberal groups via evaluation and comparison on the diversion of the meaning of the hadiths and liberalism thoughts promoted through their websites and portals. The findings showed that there are misinterpretations of the hadiths of Rasulullah SAW where they had comprehended the hadiths according to their own interest. This study has an impact on society’s awareness in the hope to preserve and protect the accuracy of hadiths’ contexts.
ABSTRAK
Living Hadis adalah penjelmaan hadis dalam bentuk kepercayaan dan pengamalan yang telah bercanggah dari makna hadis yang hakiki. Pengambilan makna hadis yang bercanggah ini telah digunapakai oleh kelompok liberal dalam menegakkan hujah mereka. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membuat sorotan literatur secara sistematik ke atas hadis-hadis Rasulullah SAW yang telah digunapakai oleh kelompok Liberal. Metodologi kajian menggunakan kaedah pemerhatian ke atas latar belakang, gaps perbincangan, metod dan dapatan bagi setiap hadis yang digunakan oleh kelompok Liberal. Pengecaman terhadap kelompok Liberal dilaksanakan melalui penilaian dan perbandingan terhadap penyelewengan maksud hadis dan pemikiran Liberal yang dipromosikan melalui laman web dan portal mereka. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa hadis-hadis Rasulullah SAW telah diselewengkan dari segi pemahaman makna hadis mengikut kepentingan diri sendiri. Kajian ini memberi impak terhadap kesedaran masyarakat agar dapat memelihara dan menjaga konteks ketepatan hadis.
Downloads
References
Abdul Mukti Bin Baharuddin. (2016). Kajian awal gerakan antihadis di Malaysia. Geran Penyelidikan dan Inovasi KUIS. (GPIK) 2015. Geran Penyelidikan Inhad. 2015/P/GPIK/INHAD 001. April, 2015- Mac, 2016.
al-Suyuthi, al-Hafiz Jalaluddin. (1994). Tadrib al-rawi. Beirut: Maktabah al-Kauthar.
Aminudin Basir @ Ahmad, Mohd Radzi Othman & Nik Yusri Musa. (2006). Konsep al-Sunnah menurut ahli hadith. Jurnal Pengajian Umum. Bil. 8. 1-22.
Ariffin Ismail, M. A. (2006). Cabaran akidah: pemikiran Islam liberal. Pejabat Mufti Wilayah Persekutuan, Jabatan Perdana Menteri.
Baihaqi, Imam al-Suyuthi. (1994). Manaaqib asy-Syafi’e . Jilid ke-2. Maktabah Daar at-Turats.
Budhy Munawar-Rachman. (2011). Islam dan liberalisme. Moh. Shofan. Jakarta: Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung.
Irawan, M. S. I. (2018). Al-Tawassut wa al-i‘tidal: Menjawab tantangan liberalisme dan konservatisme Islam. Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 14(1), 49-74
Kassim Ahmad. (2002). Dilema umat Islam - antara Hadis dan Quran. Pulau Pinang: Wisma KGN Pengkalan Weld.
Mazlan Ibrahim & Latifah Abdul Majid. (2013). Pengajian Islam di IPT Malaysia dalam menangani Islam liberal. Jurnal Hadhari. 5 (1) (2013) 37-5.
Mazlan Ibrahim, Latifah Abdul Majid Dan Fadlan Mohd Othman. (2012). Islam liberal isu dan reaksi. Selangor: Jabatan Agama Islam.
Michie, S. & Williams, S. (2003). Reducing work related psychological ill health and sickness absence: a systematic literature review. Occup Environ Med, 3–9.
Mirna Fidiana. (2014). Study al-Quran dan al-Hadis; Bab metodologi penelitian the Living Quran dan Hadis. UIN Maliki Press.
Mohd Aizam Bin Mas’od. (2013). Diskusi isu aqidah dan pemikiran semasa di Malaysia. Shah Alam: Reka Cetak Sdn. Bhd.
Muhammad Said Din. (1980). al-Imam al-Hafiz al-Hasan Ibn Muhammad al-Saghani wa risalatuhu al-darr al-multaqit fi tabyin al-ghalat. Yayasan Pengajian Tinggi Islam Kelantan.
Muhammad Mustaqim. (2016). Penghujahan rasional GAH: Satu Analisis. Journal Hadis. Vol. 6, No. 12, 21-31.
Mursi, Mohamad Munir. (1987). al-Tarbiah al-Islamiah usuluha wa tatowuriha fi al-bilad al-Arabiah. Beirut: Dar al-Maarif.
Ramli Abdul Wahid MA. (2017). Masa depan perkembangan kajian hadis di nusantara. Kertas dibentangkan dalam Seminar IMAM anjuran Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor, 15 Nov, Bangi.
Rifyal Ka’bah. (1994). Islam dan serangan pemikiran, Jakarta: Granada Nadia.
Salbiah Mohamed Salleh. (2016). Instrumen berorientasi Islam: Satu pendekatan tinjauan literatur sistematik. Wacana Pendidikan Islam Siri Ke 11, 15-16 November 2016, Institut Latihan Islam Malaysia (ILIM), Bangi, Selangor.
Siddiqi, N., House, A. O. & Holmes, J. D. (2006). Occurrence and outcome of delirium in medical in-patients: A systematic literature review. Age and Ageing, 35(4), 350- 364.
Tariq Ramadhan. (2018). Reformasi radikal etika Islami dan pembebasan. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Renaissance Front Berhad.
Umar Mukhtar. (2016). Irsyad al-Hadith siri ke-16: Hadis tentang mujaddid (reformasi) agama. 10 Mac.
Wan Roslili binti Majid, ‘Khutbah Wada’: Pedoman berharga umat akhir zaman’. Institut Kefahaman Islam Malaysia (IKIM). November 27, (2007).
Zaidul Amin Suffian Ahmad, Abdul Mukti Baharudin, Norzi Nasir, Rosni Wazir, Asyikin Hasan Adali. (2016). Kesan pemikiran liberal terhadap golongan anti Hadith di Malaysia. M.s 1-10. Prosiding Imam 2017. Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor.
Zikri Darussamin. (2017). Kassim Ahmad pelopor inkar sunnah di Malaysia. AlFikra: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, Vol. 8, No. 1, 19-34.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Upon acceptance of an article, Authors will be asked to transfer copyright. This transfer will ensure the widest possible dissemination of information. A notification will be sent to the corresponding Author confirming receipt of the manuscript.
If excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the Author(s) must obtain written permission from the copyright owners and credit the source(s) in the article.
Also, this work is licenced under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
